Article
Details
Citation
Frowd CD, Bruce V, Ness H, Bowie L, Paterson J, Thomson-Bogner C, McIntyre AH & Hancock PJB (2007) Parallel approaches to composite production: interfaces that behave contrary to expectation. Ergonomics, 50 (4), pp. 562-585. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130601154855
Abstract
This paper examines two facial composite systems that present multiple faces during construction to more closely resemble natural face processing. We evaluated a ¡®parallel¡¯ version of PRO-fit, which presents facial features in sets of six or twelve, and EvoFIT, a system in development, that contains a holistic face model and an evolutionary interface. The PRO-fit parallel interface turned out not to be quite as good as the ¡®serial¡¯ version as it appeared to interfere with holistic face processing. Composites from EvoFIT were named almost three times better than PRO-fit, but a benefit emerged under feature encoding, suggesting that recall has a greater role for EvoFIT than previously thought. In general, an advantage was found for feature encoding, replicating a previous finding in this area, and also for a novel ¡®holistic¡¯ interview.
Keywords
Facial composite; Parallel presentation; Memory; Holistic; Witness; Photomontage; Face perception; Witnesses; Face Physiology
Journal
Ergonomics: Volume 50, Issue 4
| Status | Published |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 30/04/2007 |
| Publication date online | 21/02/2007 |
| URL | |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
| ISSN | 0014-0139 |
| eISSN | 1366-5847 |
People (1)
Emeritus Professor, Psychology